Microfinance institutions all begin with value capital. Aid organizations, depositors, and banks all borrow them money. They borrowed according to their ability in terms of payback schedule, amount, and interest rate without going beyond thresholds risk put up by conglomerates of lenders, the board of directors, and management, not breaking regulations set by local banking. Microfinance bank owns divisional offices headed by credit officers who have cordial affairs with community members to deliberate on microfinance institutions’ products loan. They also take back interest and significant payback if those that borrow money must pay back in cash, which they have no means to take to the divisional offices. The head office and marketing department are the determinants of the loan approval processes. Which is subsequently implemented by the marketing department, department of operations, credit, and product department at the head office, divisional office staff inclusive.
Difference between microfinance and bank
The difference between microfinance and bank lies in their scope because microfinance helps those who really need loans with little to no asset to the clients, while a bank gives clients a loan if they have the collateral. Microfinance is individual-focused, provides money to needy individuals or small businesses that lack access to conventional resources. Microfinance has lower costs of capital relative to risk, no collateral, greater leverage than traditional banks.
Some MFIs are non-profit oriented, but these are just an exception, not the norm. Although many MFIs kick-off as non-profits later transformed to for-profits. Investors are profit-motivated such are MFIs owners. Sometimes socially motivated funds are used by the owners to make investments, not always, though. Large MFIs heads such as CEOs, COOs and CFOs are in mindsets similar to the managers of same-sized banks in countries like the U.S or another country. They give shareholders back value by planning to execute plans drafted with the board of directors’ concerted effort. To achieve this, there is a need to build a profitable, effective, and lasting organization that earns respect and trust from its customers, lenders, workers, and rural regulators. Some managers do feel concerned about building their countries to create opportunities for their people. While some don’t care, putting their interest rates may be thirty percent annually. Their motives for profit-making, microfinance’s importance is evident looking at the other options costumers would opt-in for if MFIs are not in existence. These other options could be local money lenders that lend money at an interest rate not less than 500% per annum.
The highlight here are some factors distinguishing microfinance bank from commercial banks:
(A) LOWER COSTS OF CAPITAL RELATIVE TO RISKS: This can make MFIs more lucrative than traditional banks. Most investors put their money in MFIs that are motivated socially and have minimal return rates if required social standards are met. Far below-market interest rates MFIs borrowed from their lenders, e.g., aid organization, or perhaps part of a large western bank. MFIs grow by often taking deposits from their customers, motivating them with huge interest rates of 10% annually on the savings account. Unlike FDIC in the US, the government of countries where MFIs operate doesn’t guarantee these deposits. Deposits are attractive to financing independent because it helps them make provision for financing independent of international capital markets. However, there is increased regulation and high cost that often comes with deposits.
(B) NO COLLATERAL: Lending in traditional commercial banks is not unsecured but often secured by assets like land, vehicles, etc. In contrast, MFIs’ lending usually not secure. The borrower’s assets are safe even if they fail to pay back their loans, but with a penalty not to lend to such customer again. They may also report such borrowers to community leaders or lead to such a community’s social consequences by increasing interest rates on loans by any community members. Why didn’t MFIs take collateral? This is because the borrowers are almost poor or at the poverty line. Hence it is unutterable by MFIs to investors who are socially inclined or local media.
Furthermore, MFIs jurisdiction’s legal systems are too feeble to support loan collateral. However, asset lending is not uncommon in MFIs when the loan is meant to acquire specific assets.
(C) GREATER LEVERAGE THAN TRADITIONAL BANKS: Microfinance is often at the mercy of central banks compared to other banks in any country they operate. For instance, higher for MFIs than other banks is the maximum asset to equity ratio. A low-income individual often benefits from a certain percentage of their loans; this also makes them be licensed as MFI instead of a bank. MFI loan size average is usually under a certain amount. MFI makes access to capital more accessible for low-income earners compared to other banks. This is as a result of their looser capital requirement.
(D) TARGET MARKET: The microfinance target market is low-income earners who do not use the bank. For instance, peasant farmers or petty traders earning between $800 to $5000 per annum. However, this doesn’t mean they are more generous. Knowing fully well that they charge these people higher interest rates than the high-income earner in the communities who possess assets can be collateral. The low-income individuals given loans relative to their income level are not riskier, provided their income is steady.
These MFI borrowers can also be diligent workers in their businesses, just like other wealthy members of their community. They can also be spurred to give their families opportunities even as they maintain their dignity and reputation in the community.
(E) GROUP LENDING: one of the leading methods in MFI is group lending. A group of individuals in a community may secure loans and act as a guarantor to one another. The idea behind this is if one person could not refund, others have to pay back, or they all face the penalty of not getting a loan from microfinance again. The operating costs that accompany this method’s implementation yield lesser profits than individual loans. However, it is not without benefit, among which is social pressure, also helps the community.
Furthermore, MFI also has many players they partner with, such as crowd-funding and insurance from micro-insurers. Some sellers of goods do partner with microfinance to boost the finances of their business.
Difference between microfinance and commercial bank by definition
Commercial banks, as financial institutions, are established based on the banking regulation act. They function solely to accept money and lend money out to customers. Do banks trade forex? Yes, other functions include brokerage, insurance, stocks, security, etc. All of these are non-banking activities. Commercial banks are profit-oriented. Among the characteristics of commercial banks are dividends, payment of tax, registration, etc.
Microfinance is not profit-minded. The activity in microfinance is done more in a group. Each member of the group has savings. Thus the microfinance aims at giving a loan to any member of the group. The group ensures the money is being used and the group member earns profit from any income making enterprises they engage in. Every member of the group is entitled to a loan or perhaps get a loan. This, in turn, self-sustain the group. Unlike a commercial bank, microfinance is devoid of registration, dividends, and taxation.
Difference between microfinance and commercial bank
They deal with various customers in terms of definition. Microfinance renders financial assistance and or gives loans to low-income earners of local families. On the other hand, commercial banks give loans to people and prominent organizations that open accounts. The worth of note is that their difference per se is based on the customers they deal with, not even the loan’s magnitude.
MFIs basically lend money funded by private equity holders and or individuals. So, sources of funds for microfinance institutions can be different from private equity holders to individuals. Commercial banks offer financial services range from lending, savings to insurance and pensions. Commercial banks are funded through stock markets.
MFIs services are DOORSTEP. That is, their staffs take financial services to customers ’ doorsteps. Whereas commercial bank services are BANK DOOR services, the customers have to go to the bank to carry out any financial assistance.
Commercial banks’ loan risk is relatively low. Thus, charge lower interest rates ranging from 10% to 16%. This low loan risk is predicated because they deal with people with high levels of income. In contrast, the microfinance loan interest rate is high, say 20%-25%, operate collateral-free loans, land loanees are riskier.
Among other differences are dynamics in the workforce, governance structures, use of or ICT use, physical presence, etc.
History recorded that in India, commercial banks do not understand the requirements of the local market. This birth the idea of micro-financial institutions. They offer financial help to local families of low income that couldn’t transact business with commercial banks. With free collateral loans, they offer financial services to several poor people.
Commercial banks cannot cope with the high risk of the given loans to the poor that residents in rural areas whose small loans are hard to maintain in terms of cost. The challenges of commercial banks, microfinance rose to conquer by giving loans to the destitute.
MFIs help the poor in remote areas to scale up their business by giving them small loans. No provision of other facilities like insurance, cash withdrawal from automated teller machines, credit/debit card provision, etc. At the same time, such services are available in commercial banks. Commercial banks also help to manage customer cash, give reports on their accounts, etc.
There is no collateral-free loan in commercial banks. MFIs give collateral-free loans. There’s extensive scrutiny in commercial banks before issuing out the loan. Such scrutiny is not available in Microfinance.
Some amount has to be deposited to the MFI before giving out loans to any group members in terms of deposit. Whereas in commercial banks, the depositor is required to pay a fixed rate of interest corresponding to a specific amount to be given out as a loan
MFIs seek to bridge the gap in society’s segment, not touch by commercial banks, which exposed them to private borrowers.
Commercial banks’ lending operations cover renewable energy, agriculture, housing, micro, small and medium enterprises, education, etc.
They also differ in their approaches to risk management. MFIs manage risk by contacting their customers often. Also, train their staff (off-field staff) and customers. Self-deserved and an imposed risk management system that is advanced are used in commercial banks.
Microfinance charge rates are higher than other banks to meet up with their cost and make service available.
However, the local money lenders whose interest rates can be thousands received far above this from people.
Microfinance still face challenges sustaining themselves in the rural areas. A case study that exposed the MFI environment is the Andhra Pradesh microfinance saga.
MFIs are not profits oriented; experts give loans to local communities, be it group or individual. They are into micro-financing and do not lend huge money to customers.
On the other hand, commercial banks do a wide range of financial services to corporate bodies and individuals. They are profit-minded. They offer other financial services like guarantees, savings, credit letters, etc.