NTM means the period of the Next Twelve Months in finance.
When you are engaging in the world of business, there is no doubt that you will be exposed to the term… You will also need to know about EV and EBITDA, as these terms are used interactively with each other.
Often, all these abbreviations are strung together, such as NTM EBITDA, to form a metric that is applied to finances as a way for buyers to conduct an assessment of the feasibility of the valuation of a particular target which the buyer is interested in. Thus, this metric applies three distinct terms.
NTM EBITDA indicates the company’s EBITDA over the next twelve months (NTM) of operations and represents a crucial financial measure that a buyer considers when conducting its valuation.
NTM EV/EBITDA is a financial metric, and it means:
The first term is the NTM. This refers to the period of the next twelve months. Then the next term is EV, which is realized to denote the enterprise value. Then the final term is EBITDA. As such, this term indicates the presence of earnings achieved before the application of taxes and depreciation. This also includes amortization.
Those who are planning to make a substantial business purchase can utilize this metric to conduct a comparison of the EV, which is achieved by performing the calculations via the application of a primary method of valuation. This can include the approach of comparing the discounted cash flow about the EBITDA of the intended target. This is noted as being a check into the feasibility of the performance regarding the designated target’s planned future concerning the upcoming year instead of relying on information from the past twelve months.
Those who are on the buying side of the transaction are highly involved in seeking the assurance that the purchase price is feasible about the performance over the upcoming year. This is based on the premise that the purchase is being made because of the intended future performance that the purchase will provide to the buyer, which will support the price paid for the transaction.
When industries are mature or stable, then the item’s performance over the past year can provide good insight into the likelihood of how well the item will perform over the upcoming year. Within the context of such industries, those on the buying side of the transaction are more apt to place their concentration on the feasibility of the TIM EV/EBITDA.
Yet, it is to be noted that concerning targets of interest that are situated in industries that are experiencing growth or that are part of markets that are growing at fast exponential rates; it is realized that considering the performance of the past year would not be relevant, which is why those engaged in the buying side of the business transaction tend to place their concentration on the feasibility of the NTM EV/EBITDA. As a result, sellers must showcase a budget over the upcoming year, which indicates the EV/EBITDA that is aggressive in essence and yet realistic. With this being the case, there is a requirement for the itemization of the key assumptions. This will provide assurances that the purchaser is satisfied with the knowledge that the amount paid is by the industry’s benchmarks and the level of tolerance.
