Table of Contents
Meet Saurav Siddiqui—also known as Sheikh Muhammad Abu Bakr Siddique—the CEO behind Siddiqui Group. In this Dubai-recorded interview, he walks through a wild portfolio spanning garments, construction, IT, and a flagship waste-to-energy buildout signed at roughly $4.2B to power multiple Bangladeshi cities. At just 36, he’s steering projects across solar and wind while employing thousands, and he’s unusually candid about how he hires, trains, and keeps teams executing at speed. That mix of scale, speed, and clarity is why his playbook matters to anyone who trades or builds for a living.
Here’s what you’ll get from this piece: how Saurav turns big ideas into predictable, cash-flowing realities; the strategy behind solving a painful market problem before raising money; why execution beats originality; and the way he structures financing (debt vs. equity), hires for integrity, and builds moats with government-backed demand. We’ll translate those moves into trader-friendly lessons—entries, risk, and scaling—so you can borrow his decision frameworks for your own strategy.
Saurav Siddiqui Playbook & Strategy: How He Actually Trades
Core Edge: Solve a Real Problem, Then Trade the Reaction
Big moves follow real solutions to real problems—whether it’s a macro imbalance, a policy gap, or an obvious supply-demand kink. This section shows how to define your trading edge around a clearly identifiable market pain and the catalysts that fix it.
- Write the “pain statement” before any trade: “X is mispriced because a Y constraint exists.”
- Track the three catalysts that relieve the constraint: policy shift, funding/credit turn, or supply normalization.
- Only take trades where you can name the specific mechanism that closes the mispricing (not just “it should go up”).
- Set an invalidation line tied to the constraint (e.g., “If funding costs don’t fall by next N days, thesis is off”).
- Size larger when the fix is in motion (data confirms progress), not when it’s just a headline.
- Exit when the constraint is visibly removed and positioning gets crowded (e.g., target sentiment/positioning percentiles).
Trade Selection: One Playbook, Many Markets
You don’t need a new method for every ticker; you need one method that ports cleanly across assets and timeframes. Here’s how to choose setups that rhyme with your edge and avoid the noise.
- Focus on 1–3 repeatable patterns: “Breakout after compression,” “First pullback after policy pivot,” “Failed rally at key funding level.”
- Build a checklist per pattern (5–7 yes/no items) and only trade when ≥80% are green.
- Keep a “no-trade list” of instruments that don’t respect your pattern structure.
- For FX/indices/commodities, require confluence from one non-price pillar (rates, positioning, or flows).
- If the setup isn’t obvious at a glance, pass; ambiguity is an automatic filter.
Risk First: Pre-Commit to Loss and Liquidity
Winning systems are built around controlled downside and reliable exits. This part locks in how you lose small and live to scale the winners.
- Risk a fixed fraction per idea (e.g., 0.25–0.75% of equity) and never exceed it to “make back” losses.
- Place stops where your thesis is wrong (structure breaks), not just below a candle wick.
- Use hard stops and an emergency kill-switch hotkey; no “mental stops.”
- Check average true range (ATR) and instrument liquidity—if your stop sits inside normal noise, widen and cut size.
- If spread widens beyond your plan (news/liquidity shock), reduce risk immediately—no heroics.
Timing & Execution: Proof > Prediction
Entries work best when the market begins doing what you expect, not before. This section explains how to let price confirm your idea without chasing.
- Enter on confirmation: break + close beyond level for trend trades; rejection + lower high for fades.
- Split entries: 50% on confirmation, 50% on first pullback; cancel the remainder if pullback morphs into reversal.
- If the first hour after entry prints the opposite structure, scratch quickly (≤−0.3R) and wait for the next clean signal.
- Avoid trading during known illiquid minutes for your asset; schedule matters more than opinions.
- Use bracket orders (stop + target) the moment you’re in; automation beats emotion.
Scaling & Exits: Press the Right Side Only
Scaling should reward evidence, not hope. Here you’ll set objective rules to add when the tape agrees—and to pay yourself on schedule.
- Add only if the distance from entry to stop has expanded in your favor (risk buffer grown).
- Each add must improve the average price without crowding the stop; if not possible, don’t add.
- Take partials at 1R and 2R to bank progress; trail the rest behind structure (swing lows/highs or moving stop anchored to last impulse).
- If momentum stalls near HTF levels (weekly/monthly), de-risk proactively—never wait for the full give-back.
- Flat by invalidation, no exceptions; cutting losers fast keeps capital available for the next high-quality press.
Information Diet: Build a “Signal Stack”
Your edge compounds when you standardize what data you check and when. This section gives you a simple stack to avoid over-researching and under-deciding.
- Daily pre-market: one macro page (rates/credit), one positioning read, one session map (levels/events).
- In-session: price + one confirming pillar only; close all news feeds during execution.
- Post-market: mark each instrument “trend,” “range,” or “transition,” and plan tomorrow’s bias from that label.
- Limit yourself to 3–5 charts per idea; more charts ≠ , more conviction.
- If an input never changes your decision, delete it from the stack.
Funding & Leverage: Keep Ammunition Dry
Survivability beats style. Manage cash, leverage, and margin so you’re never forced out of good trades by bad timing.
- Cap gross exposure and net leverage by a written limit (e.g., gross ≤ 4×, margin utilization ≤ 35%).
- Hold a cash buffer sized to cover the worst 5-day VaR at your current book.
- Never finance long-term trades with short-term funding; match duration to thesis horizon.
- If margin utilization spikes during a drawdown, auto-reduce the lowest-conviction positions first.
- When volatility regime shifts up, halve size before you adjust anything else.
Journal & Metrics: Turn Experience into Edge
Pros improve because they measure. This section turns your trading into a feedback loop you can actually use.
- Log every trade with: setup name, checklist score, R planned, R realized, and a screenshot.
- Track three KPIs weekly: hit rate by setup, average R per winner, average R per loser.
- Kill or refactor any setup with <0.2R expectancy over 30 trades.
- Rehearse the week’s top two mistakes each Sunday and write one rule to prevent each from repeating.
- Archive “A-setups that you didn’t take” and why—missed alpha is a real cost.
Team & Process: Systemize What You Can
Whether you trade solo or with a small crew, repeatability comes from process. This section shows how to make your edge less personal and more industrial.
- Create a one-page SOP for prep, execution, and review; follow it verbatim for 30 sessions.
- Assign roles, even if it’s just you (analyst, risk, execution)—switch hats intentionally to avoid bias.
- Automate routine tasks: alerts, screens, risk checks, and journal capture.
- Run a weekly “post-mortem” with scorecards for decisions, not just P&L.
- If a process step saves time but increases error risk, add a compensating control (checklist or automated guardrail).
Psychology: Integrity, Not Intensity
Discipline isn’t hype; it’s keeping small promises to yourself. These principles keep your mindset steady across wins and losses.
- Define your maximum daily loss and stop trading when you hit it; protect the next day’s edge.
- Use “if-then” scripts before the open (e.g., “If breakout fails, then flip bias only after a lower high”).
- After two consecutive rule breaks, go flat for the day—behavior before P&L.
- Celebrate process compliance (good loss, correct scratch) the same way you celebrate winners.
- Sleep, training, and a fixed start time are part of the system; treat them as risk tools, not lifestyle choices.
Size Positions by Volatility, Not Ego or Dollar Amounts
Saurav Siddiqui hammers a simple rule: your risk should flex with volatility, not your mood or account size. He treats ATR or recent daily range as the yardstick, so each trade risks the same percentage of equity but adapts to current market noise. When range expands, his position size contracts; when range compresses, he sizes up—so one loser never nukes the week. He also ties stop distance to structure plus a volatility buffer, not arbitrary pip counts.
Saurav makes the sizing rule mechanical to kill hesitation. Before entry, he calculates units from risk budget ÷ stop distance, then rounds down to the nearest safe lot—no exceptions. If volatility regime shifts mid-trade, he scales risk down first and asks questions later. This way, Siddiqui’s winners pay on merit, and his losers stay small enough to keep him in the game for the next high-quality setup.
Define Risk Upfront; Let Profits Run on Clear Structure
Before he clicks buy or sell, Saurav Siddiqui fixes the worst-case outcome in writing: max loss per idea, per day, and per week. He places stops where the thesis is invalid—beyond structure plus a volatility buffer—then sizes the position from risk budget ÷ stop distance. No “mental stops,” no moving the line; an OCO order locks the stop and first targets the moment he’s in. If an event can gap price through his level, Siddiqui either reduces the size or skips the trade entirely.
On the profit side, he lets structure—not feelings—decide how long to hold. First partial comes at 1R to bank progress, then he trails behind higher lows/lower highs or the last impulse’s swing point. He only moves a stop to break-even once the market makes a new structural leg, not just a tiny blip. When momentum dies at a major higher-timeframe level, he deliberately de-risks instead of waiting for a full give-back. That way, Saurav Siddiqui compounds winners while keeping every loser prepaid and contained.
Diversify by Strategy, Underlying, and Timeframe to Smooth Equity
Saurav Siddiqui doesn’t diversify for the sake of variety; he diversifies to kill correlation spikes. He splits risk across a few uncorrelated plays—trend continuation, mean reversion, and catalyst-driven—so one regime change can’t wreck the book. Underlyings get the same treatment: he won’t stack GBP, EUR, and DXY bets that all hinge on the same dollar impulse. If two trades rhyme, he treats them as one risk and halves the size.
Timeframe diversification is Saurav’s shock absorber. He pairs slower swing positions with tightly defined intraday opportunities, letting small, frequent wins refill the tank while bigger themes mature. Review days decide which bucket gets the allocation—if swings are cold, he leans on intraday edges; if trends are clean, he lets swings carry and cuts the scalps. That way, Siddiqui’s P&L staircase grows steadier, with fewer nasty drawdown clumps.
Trade Mechanics Over Predictions: Triggers, Checklists, and Repeatable Setups
Saurav Siddiqui doesn’t bet on being right; he bets on his mechanics being consistent. He defines a trigger first—break and close beyond a key level, rejection wick plus lower high, or first pullback after a momentum burst—then waits for the market to print it. A short checklist runs the show: context (trend/range), level quality, volatility, liquidity window, and risk math. If any box stays red, he passes, even if the chart looks “almost perfect.” That discipline lets Siddiqui compound an edge without needing to predict tomorrow’s headline.
Once triggered, Saurav executes the same way every time. He splits entries (confirmation, then pullback), locks in an OCO (stop and first target), and cancels the add if the pullback morphs into a reversal. If the first post-entry candle structure disagrees, he scratches small and resets—mechanics over pride. He journals the setup name and checklist score so the data, not memory, decides what stays in the playbook. The result is a tight loop: precise triggers, binary checklists, and a finite menu of repeatable setups that work across markets and regimes.
Discipline the Process: Daily Limits, Reviews, and Non-Negotiable Rules
Saurav Siddiqui treats discipline like code—you either run it or you don’t ship. He sets a hard daily loss limit and walks the moment it’s hit, preserving capital and headspace for tomorrow. A pre-session routine locks in bias, key levels, and risk per trade, while a mid-session checkpoint forces him to slow down if he’s deviating from plan. The goal isn’t heroics; it’s clean execution and the ability to trade again.
After the close, Saurav runs a short, ruthless review: which rules fired, which failed, and what gets fixed before the next bell. He tags every trade by setup name and checklist score, so performance is traceable and unemotional. Two rule breaks trigger an automatic cool-off—flat screens, no exceptions—because behavior beats P&L. That’s how Siddiqui keeps the edge sharp: daily limits, structured reviews, and rules that don’t bend when the tape gets loud.
In the end, what makes Saurav Siddiqui stand out isn’t the headline numbers—it’s the operating system behind them. He builds around a real, painful problem, secures the right stakeholders, and executes in boring, repeatable steps until value shows up on the tape. That mindset ports straight into markets: define the mispricing and the specific catalyst that closes it, fix max loss before entry, and let confirmation—not hope—pull the trigger. When volatility jumps, he scales risk down first; when structure confirms, he presses—always with exits planned around the same structure that justified the trade.
Across his story, the same rules loop: diversify by strategy and timeframe to keep correlation spikes from wrecking the book; measure what matters (setup quality, R per trade, behavior), and kill anything that doesn’t earn its seat. He treats integrity and process as hard edges—daily limits, written checklists, post-session reviews, and automation wherever emotion tries to creep in. Whether you’re trading GBPUSD or building a billion-dollar project, Siddiqui’s lesson is the same: solve a real problem, risk small when you’re uncertain, size up only when the market agrees, and let disciplined mechanics—not predictions—compound over time.
Related posts:
- All-Female Trader Strategy Roundtable: Lessons, Mindset, and Strategy from Miami
- From Crypto to FX: Trader Strategy Lessons with Marshy
- Trader Strategy Playbook: Lessons from Lance Breitstein
- Trader Strategy Playbook: Lessons from Axel Rudolph
- Trader Strategy Roundtable: Lessons From 100+ Years On The Tape
- Trader Strategy Deep Dive: Lessons from a Pit Legend
- Trader Strategy: Lessons from the “Einstein of Wall Street”
- The Contrarian Trader Strategy: Lessons from Jason Shapiro
- From Debt to Discipline: Trader Strategy Lessons with Nehal
- From $300 to Seven Figures: Trader Strategy Lessons with Alyse Amores
- Behind-the-Camera to Trader: Strategy Lessons from Josh Thornalley
- Trader Strategy Playbook: Lessons from The Viper Group’s Cal
