Table of Contents
Brent Penfold—veteran futures trader and author of The Universal Principles of Successful Trading and The Universal Tactics of Successful Trend Trading—joins for a straight-talk interview on what really keeps traders in the game. Known for turning big ideas into testable rules, Brent hammers home why money management outranks methodology and psychology, and why every decision should be anchored to your personal risk of ruin. If you’re new to his work, think practical, code-able processes over vibes—and a deep respect for robust, diversified market design.
In this piece, you’ll learn Brent Penfold’s playbook: how to audit your own trading to calculate expectancy, measure and drive your risk of ruin toward zero, and size positions as “units of money” that protect your account. You’ll see why he prefers universal, diversified portfolios for strategy development, how to benchmark against a simple, durable model (like the Turtle rules), and how to stress-test your equity curve with small variable shifts before risking real capital. By the end, you’ll have a clear, beginner-friendly roadmap—grounded in data, not discretion—for building a strategy you can actually trade tomorrow.
Brent Penfold Playbook & Strategy: How He Actually Trades
Risk-First Foundation: Drive Risk of Ruin Toward 0%
Everything starts with survival. Brent keeps his focus on protecting risk capital so the strategy has time to work, aiming to push the risk of ruin to effectively 0%. Here’s how he operationalizes that mindset.
- Define “risk of ruin” for your account and calculate it before you place a single trade; do not trade a plan that yields anything above ~0%.
- Cap initial risk per trade at 0.25%–1.00% of equity; reduce size after drawdowns until risk of ruin returns to ~0%.
- Pre-commit to a maximum portfolio heat (sum of open risks) at 2%–4% so clustered losses can’t spiral.
- Recompute risk of ruin whenever your win rate, payoff ratio, or position size changes. Automate this in your journal.
Expectancy Math Over Ego
He treats trading like a math business, not a prediction game. The goal is durable positive expectancy, measured and reviewed, not being “right.”
- Track: win% %, average win, average loss, and trade count; compute expectancy = (win% × avg win) − (loss% × avg loss) every week.
- Only scale size when expectancy and sample size are both robust (e.g., 200+ trades with stable metrics).
- If expectancy degrades beyond a preset threshold (e.g., z-score or a 20% drop vs. baseline), cut size in half and review.
Position Sizing: Units of Risk, Not Lots
Brent expresses all trades in standardized risk units, so sizing is consistent across markets and conditions. This keeps losses small and comparable while letting winners express themselves.
- Convert each setup to “1R” (your chosen % risk of equity); position size = R / stop distance (in $ terms).
- Favor small, repeatable R (0.25%–0.75%) to allow diversification and avoid compounding error.
- After any 2R–3R drawdown, auto-de-gear: reduce R by 50% until equity recovers to the prior peak.
Strategy Edge: Simple, Robust Trend Capture
His playbook emphasizes universal, testable trend tactics over complex prediction—letting risk management and diversification do the heavy lifting. The entry is simple; the edge is in robustness and discipline.
- Use a mechanical trend filter (e.g., price above/below a medium-term moving average or breakout of recent range) to define bias.
- Enter on strength/weakness confirmations; skip trades that violate volatility or liquidity minima.
- Trail exits mechanically (e.g., ATR-based stop or opposite breakout) and never override an exit rule based on opinion.
Diversification: Markets, Systems, Time
Brent offsets the randomness of any single bet by spreading risk across uncorrelated streams. This smooths the equity curve and protects the business.
- Trade multiple liquid markets (e.g., equities, rates, FX, commodities) with the same rule set and sizing framework.
- Run at least two complementary systems (e.g., intermediate-term trend and shorter swing/mean-reversion) with independent risk budgets.
- Stagger entries across time (daily/weekly scans) to reduce timing luck and portfolio heat spikes.
The Written Plan: One Page, Zero Ambiguity
He insists everything be written down so there’s no room for “maybe.” A tight plan converts good intentions into repeatable behavior.
- Document: universe, setups, exact entries/exits, risk per trade, portfolio heat cap, and scaling rules on one page.
- Add pre-trade checks (trend filter passed, volatility fit, news/rollover constraints) and post-trade logging requirements.
- Review the plan monthly; any change requires a forward-test checklist and a cooldown period before going live.
Stops That Respect Volatility
Stops are set where the trade thesis is invalidated, not where pain begins. Using volatility-aware placement prevents “death by noise.”
- Initial stop = entry price − (k × ATR) for longs (and + for shorts), with k fixed per system (e.g., 2–3).
- Trail using the higher of (moving protective stop) and (structure stop behind prior swing), never widening after entry.
- If the stop distance expands due to volatility, reduce the size so R remains constant.
Equity Momentum & Kill-Switches
When the strategy falls out of sync, he cuts risk quickly and lets a simple equity curve rule dictate when to resume. This avoids slow bleeds that ruin confidence.
- If the strategy’s equity closes below its 50-day average (or breaches a max drawdown threshold), halve risk or pause new entries.
- Resume normal risk only after equity reclaims the moving average (or recovers half the drawdown), whichever comes first.
- Keep kill-switch rules mechanical; no “feel-based” overrides.
Daily Routine: Fast, Systematic, Done by 9:30
Brent’s process is designed to be efficient: scan, size, place, and move on. The discipline is in preparation, not screen-staring.
- Pre-market: update data, run scans, and generate orders; sanity-check portfolio heat and correlation before placing.
- During market: set alerts only at decision points; do not micromanage open trades.
- End of day/week: log results, refresh expectancy metrics, and recompute risk of ruin after any material change.
Psychology as a Risk Tool
He treats psychology as the discipline to execute the plan, not as a substitute for it. Confidence comes from rules you trust and have tested.
- Pre-commit to a tiny R so you can follow rules under stress; size discipline beats willpower.
- Use checklists before and after trades to remove ambiguity and reduce emotional decision points.
- If you break a rule, cut the size for the next five trades, and review the plan to locate the friction point.
Continuous Improvement: Small Tweaks, Big Protection
Brent favors small, testable tweaks over wholesale reinvention. Protecting the edge means changing as little as possible while eliminating real defects.
- When metrics slip, change one variable at a time (filter, stop multiple, or risk per trade) and forward-test for 50–100 trades.
- Keep a “do not touch” list: core sizing rules, max heat, and kill-switch logic. These guardrails are permanent.
- Archive every iteration with dates and metrics so you can roll back quickly if a tweak underperforms.
Size risk first and drive risk of ruin toward zero
Brent Penfold starts with survival because survival buys you time for the edge to play out. Before he thinks about entries, he fixes a tiny percentage of equity to risk per trade so a streak of losers can’t knock him out. He treats every position as a “1R” decision, then sizes the trade backward from the stop so the cash at risk stays constant. If equity dips, he automatically shrinks R rather than waiting for confidence to come back. That mechanical downshift keeps the risk of ruin near zero even when markets get loud.
Penfold’s focus on ruin math turns emotions into settings, not opinions. He caps total portfolio heat, so multiple open trades can’t combine into a silent blowup. When volatility widens, he narrows the size so the dollar risk stays the same while the stop breathes. And when his metrics slip, he halves risk first and asks questions second, preserving capital so the strategy can live to fight another day.
Standardize position size with R units, not lots or contracts.
Brent Penfold treats size as a math problem, not a vibe. He defines a fixed “R” as a small percent of equity and makes every trade express exactly 1R (or 0.5R, 0.75R) regardless of the market. That way, a wheat trade and a Nasdaq trade risk the same dollars even if their tick values and volatility are wildly different. It’s a universal language for risk, so performance comes from execution, not from accidentally oversizing the “exciting” markets.
Penfold then sizes backward from the stop: position size equals R divided by the dollar distance to the stop. If the stop needs to be wider because volatility expands, the position simply gets smaller, so the cash at risk stays constant. When equity draws down, R shrinks automatically, taking leverage down with it before emotions can interfere. The result is clean, comparable outcomes across instruments and timeframes, with Brent Penfold’s edge coming from consistency instead of guesswork.
Build diversification by market, strategy type, and trade duration.
Brent Penfold spreads risk across independent return streams so no single idea can tank the account. He mixes uncorrelated markets—equities, rates, FX, and commodities—so trends or chop in one group don’t dictate the month. Within that, Brent Penfold runs more than one approach, pairing a simple trend model with a shorter swing or mean-reversion system to smooth bumps. Each stream gets its own risk budget, and he caps the combined portfolio heat so correlations can’t sneak up during stress.
Time also gets diversified. He staggers entries across daily and weekly signals so timing luck doesn’t decide outcomes, and he resists clustering trades into one session or single news cycle. He sizes each position as a fixed R, then limits how many Rs can be live at once to avoid silent leverage. When correlations spike, Brent Penfold cuts exposure in the most crowded themes first, keeping total heat inside his pre-set guardrails. The goal is steady compounding from many small edges, not hero trades that work only when the stars align.
Use simple mechanical entries and volatility-based stops to exit.
Brent Penfold keeps entries dead simple, so discipline never hinges on mood. He prefers objective triggers—breakouts from recent ranges or price crossing a medium-term moving average—because they’re easy to test and repeat. Once a signal fires, he sizes from stops and clicks the order without embellishment. The goal isn’t to pick tops or bottoms; it’s to catch the meat of a move with rules that work the same on wheat, gold, or the S&P.
Exits are anchored to volatility, so noise doesn’t shake him out. Brent Penfold sets the initial stop a fixed multiple of ATR beyond the invalidation point, then trails it mechanically as the trend extends. He never widens a stop after entry, only tightens with structure or the ATR trail, and he lets the system—not feelings—decide when the ride is over. If volatility expands, size shrinks, so the dollar risk stays constant, and if the market stalls, the trailing stop does the hard work of getting him flat without debate.
Measure expectancy weekly and cut size when the edge weakens.
Brent Penfold runs his trading like a small math business, and the weekly P&L audit is non-negotiable. He tracks win rate, average win, average loss, and trade count to compute expected value, so he knows whether the engine is actually printing edge. If expectancy slips beyond a predefined band, Brent Penfold assumes the market has changed before he has—and he responds with the only lever that protects survival: smaller size. The point isn’t to predict the next week; it’s to control risk while reality updates the model.
When the edge cools, he halves R first and asks questions second. That automatic de-gearing keeps confidence intact and prevents revenge tweaks that usually make drawdowns worse. If metrics stabilize and reclaim their baseline, size ratchets back up methodically; if not, he pauses new risk until the data says “go.” By making expectancy a routine check and sizing the thermostat, Brent Penfold turns uncertainty into a manageable setting instead of a career-ending surprise.
Brent Penfold’s core lesson is simple: treat trading like an engineering problem and strip out discretion wherever you can. If you can describe the rule, you can eventually code it—and once it’s coded, you can measure it, improve it, or discard it without ego. From there, he insists you audit your plan with two levers—methodology (expectancy) and money management (risk per trade)—until your calculated risk of ruin is effectively zero. Even “small” ruin probabilities are unacceptable because, over time, they still end in bust; the fix is to align win rate, payoff, and the number of “units of money” you carry so the math keeps you alive.
Penfold then makes sizing practical with his “units of money” framing: keep risk per trade a fixed slice of equity, ensure the equity curve is stable (not curve-fit), and you can operate with zero risk of ruin at realistic expectancy levels. He illustrates that a robust ~20% expectancy paired with ~30 units of money can hit zero ruin, while lower-expectancy profiles demand more units to achieve the same safety. Finally, he stress-tests durability with an equity-curve stability review: systematically bump strategy variables up and down, generate the family of alternate equity curves, and walk away if any combination shows ruin above zero. That discipline—before the trading, not after the pain—keeps Brent Penfold focused on survival, repeatability, and edges that can compound for years, not weeks.
