Table of Contents
This interview features options trader Vincent Desiano, a veteran who’s known for turning clean technical reads into high-conviction trades. We sit down to unpack his approach in a no-nonsense format—why he anchors every idea to the index futures, how that cascades into single-name setups, and what actually keeps him consistent when markets get loud. If you’re new to trading or just want a sharper playbook, this is a straight-shooting strategy session you can apply the next time you open your charts.
You’ll learn how Vincent builds a futures-led thesis first (ES/NQ), then times entries with simple break-and-retest behavior—no guessing, no FOMO. We’ll cover how he aligns with the trend, filters out intraday noise, sizes up only when the market is “hot,” and manages risk like it actually matters (because it does). By the end, you’ll have a clear, beginner-friendly blueprint for spotting higher-probability moments, structuring stops, scaling with intent, and avoiding the chop that kills most option accounts.
Vincent Desiano Playbook & Strategy: How He Actually Trades
Futures-Led Thesis First
Vincent starts with the index futures before touching a single stock or option. The idea is simple: build a directional thesis off major S&P/ES and NASDAQ/NQ levels, then mirror that bias into single-name setups. It keeps him aligned with the real driver of intraday flow.
- Map key ES/NQ levels on the 4-hour and daily first; only then drill down.
- If ES/NQ are pressing into a known rejection zone, skip longs into it; wait for either a clean reclaim or a deeper pullback.
- Let the futures decide your single-name bias (e.g., if ES rejects, don’t force longs in TSLA/NVDA/AAPL).
- Use only major reaction points, not every tiny swing; keep the chart clean and meaningful.
Trade With Trend, Not Against It
He aligns short-term trades with the broader trend and refuses to fight strong moves. This trims false starts and keeps win-rate and risk-reward saner when markets are irrationally one-sided.
- In an uptrend, avoid shorting into strength; buy the pullback to the prior breakout level (e.g., prior HOD or prior key high).
- In a downtrend, look for failure/retests from below to join the move; don’t countertrend scalp unless structure clearly shifts.
- Build the thesis on 4 hours/day; ignore most M15 noise unless it coincides with those higher-timeframe inflections.
- Fewer lines, fewer levels: only trade at meaningful zones; if nothing’s clean, don’t trade.
Entry: Break-and-Retest, Then Proof
The break is not the entry—proof is. Vincent waits for a pullback into the retest zone and wants to see buyers/ sellers show their hand before he clicks. This reduces chasing and anchors risk to a precise invalidation.
- Treat the breakout as “heads-up,” not a buy; wait for the price to pull back to the level that broke.
- Preferred signal: on M2–M5, see a dip below the retest that wicks back above and holds for several minutes.
- Want 5–10 minutes of data showing the level is defended (repeated wicks/holds).
- Enter on the reclaim/flag break after that defense; the stop goes at/just under the retest invalidation.
Timeframes That Cut Noise
He avoids the 1-minute noise and works mainly on the 2–5 minute range for execution, with the 4-hour/day for thesis. This balance gives enough detail to trigger without drowning in randomness.
- Thesis = 4H/D; Execution = M2–M5; ignore M1.
- “A+” behavior: orderly pullback, curling reclaim, and sellers trapped under the retest (visible via wicks/flag).
- If price taps and rips without building a base, size smaller or skip—it’s lower quality.
Options Selection & Sizing
The setup is technical, but the instrument is options—so timing and liquidity matter. He wants clear levels, defined invalidation, and enough time/volume so the option doesn’t decay while proof forms.
- Choose liquid weeklies with tight spreads on high-beta names that track the futures bias.
- Enter near the retest confirmation; avoid buying premium during the initial burst.
- Keep the default size modest; scale only after level defense is obvious and tape confirms.
Risk: Invalidation Is the Level
Risk is anchored to the retest itself. If the level fails, the idea is wrong—no debate. This keeps losers small and lets winners breathe back to the breakout pivot or recent high/low.
- Stop = below the retest that must hold (for longs) or above it (for shorts).
- Don’t widen stops; if defense disappears, flatten and re-assess.
- First target: back to the breakout pivot/high; partials there cover risk and de-stress the hold.
Managing the Trade
Once in, he manages around the structure that birthed the setup. Targets key prior highs/lows, flags, and the next clean level on the higher timeframe.
- Take partials into the first logical shelf (prior high/low/flag top).
- Trail against higher lows (long) or lower highs (short) while the retest area keeps holding.
- If momentum stalls right back at the breakout pivot, pay yourself and tighten up.
What to Skip (Quality Control)
Skipping mediocre setups is a superpower. Vincent’s process filters out low-probability trades so capital is reserved for A+ moments.
- No trade if the setup is far from a major level; entries should live at inflection points.
- No trade if futures are at a brick-wall rejection and you’re trying to long into it.
- No trade if all signals are on M1 or noisy M15 structures with no higher-TF context.
Pre-Market Routine
Preparation sets the day’s boundaries. Vincent pre-marks the levels that matter, so there’s zero confusion when the price gets there.
- Pre-draw 4H/D levels on ES/NQ; note prior week’s big reactions and “event bars.”
- Define “where longs make sense” and “where shorts make sense” before the bell.
- Build your single-name list that best mirrors the futures bias for clean options flow.
Mindset That Endures
Longevity beats hot streaks. Vincent emphasizes patience, foundation, and staying in the game long enough for the experience curve to turn exponential.
- Never risk what knocks you out of the game; protect mental and financial capital.
- Accept “no trade” as a winning decision when levels and structure aren’t aligned.
- Keep the craft fun and sustainable; skill compounds after the grindy early years.
Size Risk First: Volatility-Based Positioning That Survives Ugly Days
Vincent Desiano starts with risk, not the chart, because size decides whether you can play tomorrow. He scales position size to volatility, so a 2% mover doesn’t get the same dollars as a 6% ripper. A simple anchor is daily ATR or implied volatility: higher volatility, smaller size; lower volatility, normal size. He caps total “heat” across all positions, so one hot tape doesn’t quietly stack correlated risk. Before he buys anything, he knows the max loss, where he’s wrong, and how that rolls up to a daily drawdown limit.
In options, Vincent keeps the premium small when IV is high and only expands when IV cools and the structure is clean. He limits per-name exposure and avoids doubling down just to “fix” a bad average. If a stop or invalidation trigger, he exits and resizes on the next setup instead of negotiating with risk. The goal is simple: position sizes that survive ugly days so compound growth can actually happen.
Trade the Mechanic, Not the Narrative: Rules Beat Predictions
Vincent Desiano ignores the storyline and works the playbook. He defines entries as break-and-retest confirmations, not “feels bullish” hunches, and he pre-sets invalidation at the level that just proved itself. If the level fails, he’s out—no speeches, no averaging down to make a story true. He measures risk and reward before clicking buy, then lets the position do the talking.
For options, Vincent chooses instrument and expiration to match the mechanic: liquid weeklies for momentum continuation, extra time when structure needs room. He sizes according to volatility, avoids chasing the first spike, and only scales when the retest holds for real. Profit-taking is mapped to prior highs/lows or measured move targets—hit them, pay yourself, and trail the rest. It’s a boring system on purpose, because boring rules beat exciting predictions over a hundred trades.
Diversify Smart: Underlying, Strategy, and Duration for Smoother Equity Curves
Vincent Desiano spreads risk so one tape doesn’t decide his month. He diversifies by underlying (index leader, high-beta tech, and one defensive name), making sure they’re not all highly correlated at the same time. He diversifies by strategy too—mixing directional calls/puts with defined-risk spreads or calendars when volatility or structure demands it. If he’s harvesting theta on one symbol, he’ll run a momentum continuation on another, so P&L drivers aren’t identical.
He also staggers duration to keep the equity curve from whipsawing—some weeklies for momentum, some 2–6 week swings for structure, and the occasional same-day scalp only when conditions are pristine. Vincent caps total “theme exposure” (e.g., AI beta or rates sensitivity) so he isn’t secretly all-in on the same macro factor. If two positions move almost tick-for-tick, he trims one to reduce redundancy and protect the day’s drawdown limit. The result is a portfolio that can take hits without breaking, letting the good trades compound while the outliers stay contained.
Defined vs. Undefined Risk: When to Take Debit or Credit
Vincent Desiano keeps it simple: choose the structure that matches volatility, conviction, and your pain tolerance. When implied volatility is pumped and a level is likely to hold, he prefers credit spreads—defined risk, theta on his side, and a break-even that gives him breathing room. When IV is muted and he expects an actual move, he favors debit plays—calls/puts or verticals—so most of the edge comes from price expansion, not volatility collapse. He avoids naked short options into catalysts; undefined risk against a surprise is how accounts vanish.
He sizes debit spreads assuming they can go to zero and caps credit exposure so multiple small losers can’t add up to one big problem. Stops are set off price levels, not option prices; if the level breaks, he’s out, regardless of premium. On credit trades, he adjusts early if delta swells and the thesis weakens; on debits, he takes partials into the first logical shelf and lets a runner work. For Vincent, the rule is clean: pick debit when you need movement, pick credit when time and levels can do the lifting—always with risk defined before the click.
Entries that Stick: Futures-Led Bias, Break-and-Retest Confirmation
Vincent Desiano builds entries off the futures tape first, then lets single names echo that bias. He marks the key ES/NQ levels, waits for the break, and only considers risk when price retests and proves it can hold. If the retest fails or stalls under heavy supply, he stands down—no chasing a move that didn’t invite him. The power here is clarity: futures set the wind, the level sets the sail, and Vincent only launches when both align.
On the trigger, he wants confirmation on the 2–5 minute: a quick undercut and reclaim, repeated holds, or a tight flag that stops making lower lows. He clicks on strength back through the retest, not on the first spike, with a stop just below the invalidation, so the loss is small and objective. Profit is taken into the first logical shelf—prior high, VWAP reclaim, or the next higher-timeframe level—then a runner trails behind higher lows. If the structure slips, Vincent Desiano exits without debate and waits for the next clean retest, because discipline—not prediction—makes entries stick.
Vincent Desiano’s edge is built on a futures-led thesis and ruthless respect for major levels. He maps the S&P (ES) and NASDAQ (NQ) on the 4-hour/daily first, knows the big inflection points (like prior double tops or “event bar” highs), and refuses to long directly into a known rejection—because if ES/NQ reject, single names tend to follow. This zoom-out-first discipline keeps him trading where the market’s real decisions happen, not in the noisy middle where edge evaporates.
Entries are simple and strict: break-and-retest with proof. The break is just the “heads up”; he waits for a pullback into the level and wants to see buyers/sellers defend it on the 2–5 minute, often via undercut-and-reclaim wicks and several minutes of holding. The invalidation is the retest itself—if it fails, he’s out—so risk is precise and small. Because options decay, he doesn’t pretend a return to entry equals flat P&L; he manages via partials and structure, not hope, and lets time or momentum do the lifting only when the level is doing its job. It’s patience over prediction, structure over stories, and a process that keeps him in the game long enough for the experience curve to compound.
Staying power is the real secret. Vincent stresses building foundations, protecting capital through the early grind, and letting skill compound over years—because growth isn’t linear, it inflects only if you’re still around to see it. The playbook—HTF levels, futures-led bias, break-and-retest entries, options-aware risk—exists to serve that bigger goal: survive, learn, and scale when the market finally aligns.
