Table of Contents
Nick Bencino sits down for a YouTube live session to talk straight trading—no fluff. He’s a price-action trader who made his bones in forex and now applies the same clean, candlestick-first read to crypto. The vibe here is practical: why price action still cuts through noise, when lower timeframes make sense on volatile coins, and how to think about support/resistance like real zones instead of razor-thin lines. If you’re newer to the game, this conversation gives you a friendly on-ramp without drowning you in jargon.
You’ll learn the core of Nick’s playbook: read candles as a story of buyers vs. sellers, anchor trades to well-defined levels, and match timeframe to market behavior (higher-timeframe swing setups for forex; tighter, faster execution for crypto). He lays out simple but crucial risk ideas—tiering position size by setup quality, keeping stops behind real barriers, and letting data guide decisions instead of nerves. Expect clear pointers on patience, checklists, and avoiding common traps like chasing headlines or moving stops the wrong way. By the end, you’ll have a concrete framework you can start applying to your charts today.
Nick Bencino Playbook & Strategy: How He Actually Trades
Market focus and when he chooses to trade
Nick keeps his universe simple so execution stays fast. He focuses on liquid forex majors and a shortlist of crypto pairs where price action is clean and spreads are sensible. Sessions matter to him because flow changes behavior—he prefers to be active when volatility is purposeful, not random.
- Trade a tight watchlist: EURUSD, GBPUSD, USDJPY, XAUUSD, plus 3–5 top-volume crypto pairs.
- Only trade when spreads and depth are favorable; skip thin conditions.
- Prioritize London and New York sessions for forex; crypto gets stricter time windows to avoid chop.
- Sit out calendar bombs unless the setup is formed well before, and the risk can be bracketed cleanly.
- If volatility is erratic, cut size or stand aside; don’t “force” action.
Clean charts, real zones, and multi-timeframe prep
Nick starts with a clean chart and builds context from higher to lower timeframes. He marks zones—not single lines—around areas where price repeatedly reacted. That structure gives him a map so he can wait for the price to come to him instead of chasing.
- Top-down each day: weekly → daily → 4H → 1H → execution TF.
- Draw zones using clusters of wicks and closes; avoid razor-thin lines.
- Note trend bias on the daily; only trade with it unless a strong reversal signal forms at a major zone.
- Pre-label “decision points” where you’ll act or pass; no analysis mid-candle.
- Set alerts at the edges of zones so you’re reacting to price, not staring at it.
Entry triggers: simple price action that repeats
He wants the market to tip its hand with a clear rejection or shift in control at a level he already mapped. Candles are read as a story: failed pushes, aggressive rejections, true breaks, and clean retests. No signal at a level means no trade.
- Valid triggers: pin bar rejecting a zone, engulfing close through local structure, or break-retest with strong follow-through.
- Only take signals that form at pre-marked levels and align with higher-timeframe bias.
- Require body quality: strong close in trigger direction; avoid tiny indecision candles.
- Time-of-day filter: favor session opens for momentum; fade signals during dead hours.
- If the first pullback after the break is messy or overlaps heavily, pass and wait for clarity.
Risk sizing and stop placement that protect the account
Nick scales risk to set up quality and keeps stops where the idea is truly invalidated—behind structure, not random pip counts. He thinks in risk units (R), so winners and losers are comparable and easy to review.
- Risk per trade: 0.25%–1.0% depending on A/B/C quality; A-setups get more, C-setups get skipped.
- Stops go beyond the zone/wick that defines the idea; never inside “noise.”
- First target usually near 1R–1.5R to pay risk; partial out, then trail behind fresh structure.
- Move to breakeven only after the market builds a higher low/lower high in your favor, not just because the price ticked green.
- Daily loss cap (e.g., −2R) and weekly drawdown stop (e.g., −6R); once hit, you’re done.
- No averaging down; add only on new, independent signals that keep the original invalidation intact.
Trade management: let structure lead, not hope
Once in a position, he manages by reading the same price action that put him in. If the structure builds, he gives the trade room; if it breaks down, he exits—simple as that. He’d rather miss a tail-end push than donate profits by overstaying.
- Trail behind swing structure (last higher low/lower high) on your execution TF.
- Scale partials into strength/weakness at predefined levels (prior highs/lows, measured move targets).
- If momentum dies at the first target and prints reversal signals, reduce exposure.
- Cancel trades that linger without progress; time stops prevent slow bleed.
- End-of-day cleanup: close leftover scalps; keep only swing positions that still meet the plan.
Forex vs. crypto: same rules, tuned execution
Nick applies the same framework across markets, but he respects each asset’s “personality.” Forex tends to reward patience on higher timeframes; crypto can move faster but demands wider invalidations relative to its volatility.
- Forex: favor 4H/D structures with 1H entries; let sessions define rhythm.
- Crypto: tighten time windows, widen stops relative to ATR, and be selective around weekend liquidity.
- Use ATR to normalize stop distance and position size across instruments.
- If volatility spikes, cut size and keep targets modest; velocity can reverse quickly.
- Never let a “volatile asset” justify sloppy entries or seat-of-the-pants risk.
The pre-trade checklist he actually uses
A short checklist keeps emotions out and consistency in. Nick won’t click buy/sell unless the setup boxes are ticked. It’s boring by design—because boring is repeatable.
- HTF bias marked and aligned with the trade idea.
- Fresh zone drawn with multiple touches or a strong reaction history.
- Valid trigger candle at the zone with quality close and session filter met.
- Stop beyond invalidation; position sized to fixed % risk.
- Targets mapped, partial plan set, alerts placed; news check done.
Journaling and reviewing that tightens the edge
He journals to track behavior and stats, not to write essays. The goal is to learn which patterns, sessions, and instruments actually pay him—and to cut everything else.
- Log each trade with screenshots before and after, plus reasons for entry/exit.
- Tag by setup type, instrument, session, and R-multiple outcome.
- Weekly review: top winners/losers, common mistakes, and one rule to tighten next week.
- Monthly pruning: drop low-performing patterns and double down on the ones with positive expectancy.
Psychology and pacing you can actually follow.
Nick treats patience and pacing as skills. He protects mental capital by limiting decisions and separating research from execution. No revenge trades, no FOMO “because crypto is moving.”
- Daily max trades (e.g., 3–5) to prevent overtrading.
- Mandatory cool-off after two consecutive losses; walk away for a session if tilted.
- Never move stops farther; either the idea is alive or it’s out.
- If you missed the move, mark the next level and wait; chasing ruins math.
- Keep process wins on the scoreboard (followed plan = win), not just P&L.
Size risk by setup quality, cap daily and weekly losses
Nick Bencino treats risk like throttle control—he opens it only when the setup truly deserves it. A-grade trades earn the top of his risk band, B-grade gets less, and C-grade simply don’t cut. He measures everything in R, so outcomes are comparable across markets and days. Stops live beyond real structure, not at arbitrary round numbers, so a single wick can’t knock him out.
He also hard-caps pain: a daily limit that ends the session and a weekly cap that pauses the campaign. If he hits −2R on the day, he’s done; at around −6R on the week, he resets and protects mental capital. Position size always flows from stop distance and the fixed percent risk, never the other way around. The result is simple math: bigger when probabilities are highest, smaller or zero when they’re not.
Trade zone, not lines; wait for clean rejection signals
Markets don’t respect razor-thin lines; they react to areas where traders previously did business. Nick Bencino maps zones using clusters of wicks and closes, then lets price come to him rather than chasing mid-range noise. He treats those zones like supply and demand shelves: entries are planned at the edges, not in the middle. Stops sit beyond the zone’s structure, so a random spike can’t invalidate a good idea.
He won’t click until price shows its hand with a clean rejection or decisive close. That can be a strong pin rejecting the zone, an engulfing close that flips control, or a break-retest with momentum on the retest candle. If the reaction is messy—long wicks both ways, tiny bodies, or choppy overlap—he waits for clarity and keeps powder dry. Time-of-day matters too; he prefers rejections aligned with session opens when follow-through is more likely.
Match timeframe to volatility; widen stops, cut size first
Volatility isn’t a green light to trade more—it’s a signal to adjust mechanics. Nick Bencino aligns his execution timeframe with the instrument’s current pace: slower markets get higher-timeframe reads and patience, faster markets get tighter execution but only with proportionally wider invalidation. He uses ATR or recent range to size stops so they live beyond ordinary noise, then backs into position size from the fixed percent risk. That was, a wider stop doesn’t inflate risk; it shrinks size and keeps the R constant.
When the tape speeds up, Nick cuts size before touching the rules that protect him. He’ll favor session windows with directional flow and skip dead zones where spikes are random. If a setup needs a microscopic stop to “work,” he passes rather than force a lower timeframe that invites chop. And when volatility fades, he stretches holding time toward swing targets instead of scalping pennies—same playbook, scaled to the market’s actual rhythm.
Prefer defined risk structures; place stops beyond real invalidation.
Nick Bencino only trades setups where the risk is literally drawn on the chart—a zone, a swing point, a break-and-retest that either holds or fails. If he can’t point to the exact candle cluster that invalidates the idea, he skips it. His stop goes beyond the structure that proves him wrong, not at a neat round number where algos love to poke. The goal isn’t a tiny stop; it’s a meaningful one that sits outside ordinary noise.
He sizes the position after the stop is set, so the monetary risk stays fixed while the distance adapts to the market. If the price closes through the zone and prints acceptance on the other side, he’s out without negotiation; invalid means exit. On the flip side, if the level holds and the market builds a higher low or lower high in his favor, he’ll lock in some gains and trail behind fresh structure. Defined risk plus objective exits keep him out of “hope mode” and let the winners breathe without donating extra R on losers.
Let mechanics lead decisions; avoid prediction and headlines.
Nick Bencino treats the plan like a contract and the chart like the only witness that matters. He doesn’t predict; he prepares levels, waits for the trigger, sizes the risk, and executes. Headlines, Twitter takes, and macro hot-takes are background noise unless price confirms at a pre-marked zone. When the rules say “no signal, no trade,” he actually does nothing, and that restraint is a big part of his edge.
His decisions during the trade are equally mechanical: partial at predefined targets, trail behind newly formed structure, and flatten when invalidation prints. He never widens stops to “give it room,” because that breaks the math he relies on. If momentum dies or structure flips, he exits without bargaining, then logs the result so the stats stay honest. By letting mechanics drive every click, Nick removes mood swings from the system and lets probability—not opinions—compound over time.
Nick Bencino’s edge isn’t a magic indicator—it’s the discipline to let clean price action at real support and resistance do the heavy lifting. He builds context from higher timeframes, marks zones where buyers and sellers actually fought, and then waits for candles that show control shifting—strong closes, decisive rejections, or a genuine break and retest. Stops live beyond the structure that proves him wrong, not at cute round numbers, and position size is always backed into fr, om fixed risk so wider stops mean smaller size, not bigger stress. Whether he’s trading forex or a fast-moving coin like bitcoin, the framework stays the same: match timeframe to current volatility, prefer session windows with purposeful flow, and skip the middle-of-the-range noise.
Just as important, Nick treats the process like a contract. He sizes by setup quality, caps daily and weekly losses, and refuses to average down. If momentum stalls or invalidation prints, he’s out—no bargaining, no “giving it more room.” He partials at planned targets, trails behind fresh structure, and journals with screenshots and tags so the stats keep him honest. Headlines don’t get a vote unless price confirms at a pre-marked level, and missing a move only means he marks the next zone and waits. In the end, his “secret sauce” is painfully simple: map the battlefield, let mechanics lead every decision, and protect risk so probability can compound over time.
