WORKS SOCIAL
(Update of the work of O. Social Deregulation) Author:
Dr. Antonio P.J. Sirin
Cardo Medical – angiologists; Medical Specialist in Occupational Medicine, Geriatrician, Medical Auditor SADAM recognized by
Ex – Ara Coordinator Polyclinic Medical Clinic Central Rail
Former Acting Director of the Municipal Hospital “Dr. Raul F, Larcade “
Ex – President of the Mutual Aid Society Staff General Belgrano Railway,
Ex – General Manager of Medical Benefits of INOS
Ex – Delegate normalization of Social Work Staff in the wine
Ad Donore Medical Advisor of the Legislature of the Porteña
Trustee Management Medical Benefits of SSSalud.
HISTORY
The affiliation of labor unions, has a direct parallel with the industrial development prospects of the country. Thus we see that in the United States statistics show us your progress: the number of members increases from 1900, shows a slow but steady progress through the first world war, then increases sharply during the same and remains in years. Undergoes rapid decline and stagnation in the 20s, again recovered sharply during the New Deal period, which followed the Great Depression and experienced a great expansion during World War II, and then entered a plateau of growth. This is what happens in countries that not only mishandled the economy, but with a sense of reality.
From the colonial era where the term “charity” was the most suitable for this activity, the religious motivation that it implied, was practiced by those who selflessly dedicated themselves to such activities for the needy in mostly by private enterprise with little or no participation by the State until the end of the eighteenth century.
In that period, confraternities, guilds and fraternities were the first forms of organized social welfare and assistance. All these terms have served only to introduce a continuous development of human concern to alleviate the suffering of others and of providing that “protection” to get the physical and spiritual welfare of those in need at certain times. Each of these institutions has emerged as an attempt to try to improve what exists.
The second stage will glimpse slowly but steadily since the early nineteenth century, with a warm state in social policy initiative that will move to the private sector, and in 1822 created the “Charitable Society and new hospitals and nursing homes . In those moments will be granted “graciously” benefits shooting involving an attempt to fix something without being able to build a real social policy stable. No such provision was suspected of “ex gratia” would, at some point, in a citizen’s right, protected by laws and public institutions. However, already beginning to set guidelines that would be the beginning of our retirement legislation:
1 .- The number of benefits in pay caps.
2 .- The non-accrual of benefits.
3 .- The limit on the enjoyment of the benefits, except for the mothers of those killed in defense of the homeland.
This comes after a history rich in social protection processes, from the year 1944 where it is processed Social Assistance in Social Security. It was the Social Justice which was established in the abutment foundation of a new law based on the dignity of the person to meet basic needs of man needed more deprived, and so far only “protected” by philanthropy, charity and charity.
It then comes to the creation of “Social Work” (OOSS), which both mean in its generic sense and in its organizational or institutional structure. Germinal Rodriguez helps provide definition whereas “mutualism, cooperation, recreational and legal aid.” These definitions are not exhaustive and reality tend to be overcome.
You can not overlook that given the evolution of the process, it was time to integrate and coordinate efforts among state formed Social Work, Unions and Associations Mutual. Is achieved then what was the most appropriate action to fill these high expectations, the creation of the National Institute of Social Work which aims, objectives and structure was set by the No 18 610.
Is this time, which in Article 12, expresses “the INOS will aim to promote, coordinate, integrate the activities of social work, and controls on its technical, administrative, financial and accounting.” Articles l and 2nd welfare activities relating to, one can thus identify with the above in its objective controller.
The synthesis of a tight social right of humanitarian coexistence has been the subject of these lines, discarding many historical landmarks as presently constituted, but leaving as baggage these struggles carried out to benefit the disadvantaged of this globalization that seems to forget contempt, Legal and Christian welfare that it is up to those trying to live.
The right to health
We can define it as a substantial part of human rights and restrictions must be respected without being left out of the market and adjust policies.
So we must consider the rights of the people related to health can be listed as:
V the right to be healthy: This includes the right to work, education and food.
v The problems that hinder this right are social: As the marginalization, unemployment, poverty and neglect.
v The right to prompt medical attention: That is what is hindered by obstacles of health care systems related to accessibility and coverage.
v The right to participate collectively in the development and implementation of health programs in defense of everyday medical care and prevention programs.
v Right to Care about the commercialization and provision is made in solidarity.
v The right to be treated by applying the advances of modern medicine and technology, and not to be used as a testbed for research modern drugs still unproven, without real consent.
v The right to be using the methods of diagnosis, estrictions complete without peer, to avoid expenses, which are such that health is not spent is invested for the sole fact prevent complications, the resources invested properly.
v Right to equity on the thought of efficiency. Should increase efficiency without losing the effectiveness of treatment. In the public health care can not be based on the premise all contain costs and to increase efficiency, and forgetful of the fundamental interests of improving health.
Definitions momentous Health Policy
The rulers of countries like ours, developing that have not yet assumed the responsibility that they bear in ensuring the right to health.
It should comply with basic services by providing a system of compulsory attendance monitoring progress from the state.
You can not accept proposals that involve policies that target we will fragment society into groups with different possibilities of access to health care, with the only factor respect to purchasing and economic power. Planning must be aimed at achieving universal coverage.
You must concoct a health policy without sins and without exclusions. Must be fair and equitable and to reach all corners of the country.
In his writing can not be left to increased unemployment and underemployment,
The fall in purchasing power is not just middle class but everyone who works. Can not be disregarded in the drafting of public health law led to the collapse of Social Work and the PAMI, either a corruption or inefficiency.
You must also erased the concept of individualism, the welfare of society must not fall within the private sphere, with the individuals themselves who must satisfy the well-being. The so-called “equal opportunity” must be understood as also equal individual resources, stop to think that it is not like living in the City of Buenos Aires in Tilcara. For more intelligent than a child born in a village in the interior is, is equality and education, and health, and to work out.
In the grounds of health law, no individual must contemplate possibilities, philosophical thought should be established based
on best medical practice possible, taking into account the scarcity of resources to deal. But equally no longer hold that before the crisis that is in crisis is a building called the hospital, which is in crisis is a human being called sick without the resources to cure their suffering.
With the policies implemented so far, which it was achieved is the inequality that far from acting as a stimulus to progress has been that they have more to enhance their profits and increases with fewer problems.
Today we are faced with the reality of economic liberalism, and a major consequence is the massive increase in population without social security cover so that the public hospital is overwhelmed by the demand of the majority population group.
Follow the course of the last ten years, is to ignore the right to health, abandon core principles of solidarity and equality, if we continue commercializing the area of health and return to the old scheme of charitable handouts overcome periods from the law 18 610, is to return to the days where the poor received some help from the better off economically, without this we mean any vested rights.
With fear and concern that we observe today is located to be sick as a commodity by subjecting it to market swings. Knowing that the laws of the market are purely individualistic nature against what should be a supportive health system and equitable. Is to apply economic fundamentalism and the expression becomes citizen user, consumer or purchaser of services. To those who defend these assumptions has little solidarity. As you can see the need for change is really urgent to a partnership model, ethical, equitable and universal.
PERSPECTIVE OF THE ECONOMIC CRISIS IN HEALTH
The country is immersed for more than ten years amid an economic depression between the third quarter of 1998 and the first of 2001 the fall in GDP has been higher than 11%. Therefore, we encounter daily in some region of the country spend hundreds of people to increase the unemployment rate. We also believe that many companies decide to end forced by circumstances and ask their operations into bankruptcy or into receivership. Without deciding the salary reductions up to 25% of the worker’s income, whether justified or not.
In addition to this we have seen an increase in social protest, embodied in blockades, strikes, occupation of public places, etc.. With the unflinching eye, and the incompetence of those in power.
The New Majority consultant conducted a study that shows the monthly evolution of the blocking of roads and public roads since 1997, which is worth examining because it marks a frank increase from 1998
YEAR
ANNUAL
AVERAGE MONTHLY
1997
140
11
1998
51
4
1999
252
21
2000
514
42
2001 (through May)
323
64
1997-2001
1280
24
The other indicator that we should examine to assess the state of unrest is the amount of general strikes produced. Considered by our government during the Alfonsin period were 13 strikes, with an average of one every three months, the Menem government in August, giving an average of one every 15 months, and during the last government of Dela frustrated Rua 6, average of one every three months.
Another verifiable fact is that the first general strike during Alfonsin’s government came after nine months of government, Menem’s Peronist government was the conflict occurred after 40 months, and the De la Rua could handle status for only three months, to support after that period the first general strike.
Correlation between unemployment and poverty.
The difficult economic situation in Argentina is also evident in the continuing rise in the unemployment rate and levels of poverty and destitution. With a workforce of just over 14 million people, approximately 2 million were unemployed at the date of this evaluation. We see that this is a dynamic deterioration, as from May 1991 to October 2000, the unemployment rate for the whole country increased by 113%, from 6.9% to 14.7%. This tells us that more than 1.2 million people have moved to the category of unemployed in nine years.
The new social scene desfinanciación deepened by the health system and the changing role of the state, which leads to fragmentation, social exclusion.
Far has been the target and the thought of the rich history of social protection processes, developed in Argentina, made by individual and collective struggles of groups of people until the year 1944 with what was achieved by transforming the Social Assistance in Social Security. It was the era where social justice was the founding pillar of the new law, based on the dignity of the person in order to meet the basic and essential needs of man dispossessed, and so far only “protected” by philanthropy, welfare and charity.
It was then the constitution of OOSS meant so much in its generic sense and in its organizational or institutional structure. As a result of all this is achieved the creation of the National Institute of Social Work which aims, objectives and structure was fixed by law No 18 610. In its evolution was replaced by Law 22 269, which although more strictly controlled development of its activities, had a fundamental reality to allow the management of funds inherent in the register of members, without direct intervention from the national treasury or entities linked to the collection that makes an arbitrary distribution.
With the Decree No. 446/2000 of 06.06.1900 amending law 23 660 and 23 661, and behind the curtain of the Deregulation of Social Work, was hiding the real aim of allowing the penetration of the liberal doctrine of privatization in the heart of the system to meet the requirements that have always been holding to a state disjointed and without economic or political forces, as were the government of Dr. Raul R. Alfonsin, in the last months of his term, and the government of Dr. Fernando De la Rua, against which the International Monetary Fund, through the strategies promoted by the World Bank to impose treatment.
At the end of President Raul Alfonsin, just three months before the election, where he was victorious Dr. Menem, arguing that the World Bank had not complied with the agreed reforms leave it in full hyperinflation.
Free Choosing Social Work
The Decree No. 446/2000 06.06.2000 (amending law 23 660 and 23 661)
The main points of the new system are:
· Be able to choose health coverage from health plans, prepaid and companies formed specifically for this purpose.
• In no case may reject any affiliate.
• Do not be waiting periods or exclusions for health coverage.
• Do not be extra fees, except for coverages higher than that required by law.
· It may change only once a year for business or social work.
• In the event of dismissal is mandatory health coverage for three months thereafter.
